MalaRis Abstract Preface Malaria archive Malaria models Scenarios Data input LMM MSM Simulations 1960-2000
LMM MSM
2001-2050
LMM MSM
Future prospects References Abbreviations Glossary Disclaimer
impetus
 

Daily larval survival probabilities from horizontal life tables (controlled conditions)

  • Raw data: colon separated values (ASCII file)

    • country place long lat M1 YYY1 M2 YYY2 pMMA,ave pMMA,min pMMA,max MMAave MMAmin MMAmax LR0ave LROmin LR0max species note Refs
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 09 2003 09 2003 -8.0 24.0 48.0 -8.0 11.2e 16.5e -8.0 91.7 94.9 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato farmland; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 09 2003 09 2003 0.0 0.0 0.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato forest; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 09 2003 09 2003 0.0 0.0 0.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato swamp; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 49.0 65.0 -8.0 12.0e 16.7e -8.0 95.3 96.5 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato farmland; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 0.0 2.0 -8.0 20.1e 27.6e -8.0 82.3 86.8 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato forest; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 6.0 33.0 -8.0 20.1e 27.6e -8.0 88.7 94.5 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato swamp; ρ ¬Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 61.0 70.0 -8.0 9.0e 12.1e -8.0 95.8 96.1 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato farmland; ρ Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 10.0 23.0 -8.0 18.4e 24.2e -8.0 90.8 93.0 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato forest; ρ Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya western Kenyan highland area -999.00 -99.00 06 2004 06 2004 -8.0 24.0 43.0 -8.0 19.3e 23.7e -8.0 94.2 96.2 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato swamp; ρ Ñ; z=1420-1580 m Munga et al. 2006
    Kenya near Kisumu -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8.0 53.5 60.6 -8.0 8.5p 9.9p -8.0 93.9 94.3 Anopheles gambiae ρ ¬Ñ Gimnig et al. 2002
    Kenya near Kisumu -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8.0 49.4 60.0 -8.0 8.1p 10.3p -8.0 91.6 95.2 Anopheles gambiae ρ Ñ Gimnig et al. 2002
    - - -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8.0 35.0 85.0 -8.0 5.4e 30.0e -8.0 94.8 98.9 Culex pipiens complex laboratory; TT Dl Mogi 1992
    Liberia Sua -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8.0 55.0 80.0 -8.0 10.6p 11.6p -8.0 94.5 98.1 Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto laboratory; ρ Schneider et al. 2000
    Zimbabwe Zambezi valley -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8.0 37.0 65.0 -8.0 9.9p 10.4p -8.0 90.4 96.0 Anopheles arabiensis laboratory; ρ Schneider et al. 2000
    Liberia - -999.00 -99.00 -8 -8 -8 -8 83.4 72.0 99.0 9.8p 8.0p 13.0 98.2 95.8 99.9 Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto laboratory; TT ρ Lyimo et al. 1992
    Mali Banambani -8.05 12.80 07 2000 08 2000 68.5 -8.0 -8.0 11.8e -8.0 -8.0 96.8 -8.0 -8.0 Anopheles gambiae sensu lato laboratory Edillo et al. 2004
    Kenya Fort Ternan 35.35 -0.20r 06 2001 08 2001 0.4 -8.0 -8.0 16.5p -8.0 -8.0 71.6 -8.0 -8.0 Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis z=1550-1650 m Koenraadt et al. 2006a

    Abbreviations

    countrycountry of the study site
    placename of the location of the study site
    longlongitude [°E]; -999.00: position unknown
    latlatitude [°N]; -99.00: position unknown; sources of latutude/longitude: a: Hay et al. 2005a, b: Hay et al. 2000b, r: taken from the reference, m: published map, i: http://www.heavens-above.com/countries.aspx
    M1month of the study start
    YYY1year of the study start
    M2month of the study end
    YYY2year of the study end
    pMMA,aveaveraged survival probability of larvae from egg to adult emergence, i.e. the proportion of larvae reaching MMA
    pMMA,minminimum survival probability of larvae from egg to adult emergence
    pMMA,maxmaximum survival probability of larvae from egg to adult emergence
    MMAaveaverage Mosquito Mature Age (e: time to adult emergence, p: time to pupation)
    MMAminminimum Mosquito Mature Age (e: time to adult emergence, p: time to pupation)
    MMAmaxmaximum Mosquito Mature Age (e: time to adult emergence, p: time to pupation)
    LR0aveaverage daily survival probability of larvae in protected habitats
    LROminminimum daily survival probability of larvae in protected habitats
    LR0maxmaximum daily survival probability of larvae in protected habitats
    speciesmosquito species
    notenotes
    Refsreferences
    NArefers to data that was not available in the reference
    ?the question mark refers to references that were not checked, since they were not available

    Comments

    Life tables for the developing immatures of mosquitoes can be constructed using either horizontal or vertical methods. Horizontal life table methods are appropriate for distinct cohorts that can be followed through time, whereas vertical life table methods are appropriate for populations with overlapping generations and age distributions that remain stationary for the duration of the sampling period (Mwangangi et al. 2006).
    Note that miminum and maximum values refer to average values that were obtained by different experimental settings (TT: different temperatures; ρ: different larval densities; Dl: different day lengths; Ñ: with additional nutriens; ¬Ñ: without added nutrients). The particular applied experimental settings are specified under the "note" column. z denotes the altitude of the study site.